Base district · public · City of Mesa AZ
Leisure and Recreation. Public and private parks only. Chapter 15 contains NO development standards table
Every verdict below is the base-district answer read out of the ordinance of record, with the section that says so. A use with no row is shown as unknown rather than folded into “no”.
Not allowed
Not listed in the district use table; the table preamble states 'Use classifications not listed are prohibited'
Not allowed
Not listed in the district use table; the table preamble states 'Use classifications not listed are prohibited'
Not allowed
Not listed in the district use table; the table preamble states 'Use classifications not listed are prohibited'
Not allowed
Not listed in the district use table; the table preamble states 'Use classifications not listed are prohibited'
Not allowed
No commercial or residential use classification is listed
Not allowed
Not listed in the district use table; the table preamble states 'Use classifications not listed are prohibited'
A blank cell means this dataset carries no number for that standard — read it as “go and look”, not as zero.
| Standard | Value | Field |
|---|---|---|
| Floor area ratio (FAR) | — | far |
| Maximum height | — | max_height_ft |
| Maximum site coverage | — | site_coverage |
| Minimum lot area | — | min_lot_area_sf |
| Minimum lot width | — | min_lot_width_ft |
| Minimum lot area per dwelling unit | — | min_lot_area_per_du_sf |
| Maximum density | — | max_du_per_acre_derived |
| Front setback | — | setback_front_ft |
| Street-side setback | — | setback_side_street_ft |
| Interior side setback | — | setback_side_interior_ft |
| Rear setback | — | setback_rear_ft |
Dimensional standards from MZO 11-15-2 / 11-15-3.
Standards notes. Section 11-15-3 states only that use permits follow Chapter 70 and that all other development follows Article 7. No lot, height, coverage or setback standards are published for LR in Title 11. Envelope must be obtained from the City
No district in this dataset publishes a floor area ratio: intensity in this code is governed by lot coverage, height and — for residential — density or minimum lot area per dwelling unit. See the metro page for the provenance note on that.
Run the envelope this district allows, free, in about a minute — lot area, FAR or height, and the residual land value it supports.
The quick screen is free and needs no account. The sample study is the seven-page deliverable the Feasibility Desk produces.
base district only; overlay geometry not checked — an Airfield or Form-Based Code designation can flip answers
This is a base-district reading of the ordinance text, transcribed from the source below. It is not a Zoning Verification Letter, not a determination by the jurisdiction, not legal advice, and not a substitute for asking the planning department about a specific parcel. Overlays, recorded plan conditions, rezoning stipulations and parcel geometry are not checked here, and any one of them can change the answer on this page.
Verify locally before you spend money. Call the planning counter, pull the parcel's zoning-map designation and its case history, and confirm the section cited above still reads the way it reads here.
Full provenance, the source hashes and the known limitations for City of Mesa AZ →