Self-storage
Not allowed
- Ordinance symbol
- —
- Code section
- MZO 11-8-2 (Table 11-8-2)
- The code's own words for this use
- Mini-Storage
- Transcription confidence
- high
Expressly shown as a prohibited use (em dash)
Base district · multifamily · City of Mesa AZ
Downtown Residence 2. Attached and multiple residence up to 12 du/net acre; Mini-Storage prohibited
Every verdict below is the base-district answer read out of the ordinance of record, with the section that says so. A use with no row is shown as unknown rather than folded into “no”.
Not allowed
Expressly shown as a prohibited use (em dash)
Permitted by right
Recorded as permitted. The cited note 16 reads 'Permitted if an existing non-conforming residential use is located on the lot', which cannot be the intended meaning: Table 11-8-3.A publishes a full minimum-lot-area ladder and a maximum density for multi-unit projects in DR-2 and DR-3, and the Additional Use Regulations column points to Chapter 81. Treated as a footnote mis-reference in the published code. VERIFY
Not allowed
Expressly prohibited (em dash)
Permitted by right
Permitted by right in all three Downtown Residence districts. The whole downtown area is inside the one-mile eligibility circle in 11-31-38(A)(1)
Permitted for Live-Work Units only — narrower than the question
DERIVED. Live-Work Units are permitted by right, but no general retail, market or eating-and-drinking classification is listed in the DR columns. Business and Professional offices are SUP-only and limited to Class 1 Historic Buildings from the 1984 City of Mesa Historical Survey (note 10), with DR-3 further limited to lots fronting an arterial (note 11)
Not allowed
Not listed in the district use table; the table preamble states 'Use classifications not listed are prohibited'
A blank cell means this dataset carries no number for that standard — read it as “go and look”, not as zero.
| Standard | Value | Field |
|---|---|---|
| Floor area ratio (FAR) | — | far |
| Maximum height | 30 ft | max_height_ft |
| Maximum site coverage | — | site_coverage |
| Minimum lot area | 6,000 sf | min_lot_area_sf |
| Minimum lot width | — | min_lot_width_ft |
| Minimum lot area per dwelling unit | — | min_lot_area_per_du_sf |
| Maximum density | 12 du / acre | max_du_per_acre_derived |
| Front setback | 15 ft | setback_front_ft |
| Street-side setback | 10 ft | setback_side_street_ft |
| Interior side setback | 5 ft | setback_side_interior_ft |
| Rear setback | 15 ft | setback_rear_ft |
Dimensional standards from MZO 11-8-2 / 11-8-3 (Table 11-8-3.A).
Standards notes. Minimum lot area ladder: 6,000 sf for 1 unit, 11,000 sf for 2 units, 15,000 sf for 3 units, 18,000 sf for 4 or more. Interior side 1-story: 5 ft for 1-2 units, 15 ft for 3 or more. 2-story: 5 ft (1 unit), 10 ft (2 units), 15 ft (3 or more). 3-story: 20 ft. Rear 15/20/20 ft by story count. Minimum open space 400 sf per detached or attached single residence, 200 sf per multiple residence unit. max_du_per_acre_derived is CODE-STATED
No district in this dataset publishes a floor area ratio: intensity in this code is governed by lot coverage, height and — for residential — density or minimum lot area per dwelling unit. See the metro page for the provenance note on that.
Run the envelope this district allows, free, in about a minute — lot area, FAR or height, and the residual land value it supports.
The quick screen is free and needs no account. The sample study is the seven-page deliverable the Feasibility Desk produces.
base district only; overlay geometry not checked — an Airfield or Form-Based Code designation can flip answers
This is a base-district reading of the ordinance text, transcribed from the source below. It is not a Zoning Verification Letter, not a determination by the jurisdiction, not legal advice, and not a substitute for asking the planning department about a specific parcel. Overlays, recorded plan conditions, rezoning stipulations and parcel geometry are not checked here, and any one of them can change the answer on this page.
Verify locally before you spend money. Call the planning counter, pull the parcel's zoning-map designation and its case history, and confirm the section cited above still reads the way it reads here.
Full provenance, the source hashes and the known limitations for City of Mesa AZ →